Comprehensive
Penetration Testing
Nine-phase adversarial assessments across every layer of your environment – from perimeter networks and cloud workloads to AI models and medical devices – fully mapped to MITRE ATT&CK, OWASP, and your compliance framework.
The Right Depth for Every Scenario
Five core methodology tiers and seven team-color engagement modes ensure every assessment matches your exact threat model and objectives.
Blackbox Assessment
Zero prior knowledge. Simulates a fully external attacker with no credentials or architecture information. Covers passive reconnaissance, open-source intelligence, active scanning, service enumeration, vulnerability exploitation, privilege escalation, lateral movement, persistence, and data exfiltration – the complete nine-phase kill chain.
Greybox Assessment
Initiated with a set of compromised or low-privilege credentials, simulating a post-breach insider or phished employee. Focuses on lateral movement paths, privilege escalation chains, credential dumping, defense evasion, and Active Directory domain compromise.
Whitebox Assessment
Full access to source code, architecture diagrams, and configuration files. Combines static application security testing (SAST), infrastructure-as-code scanning (Checkov, Trivy), secrets detection (TruffleHog, Gitleaks), dependency analysis against OSV.dev CVEs, and architecture review for the deepest possible coverage.
Crystal Box Assessment
Developer-level access including compiled binaries and runtime debuggers. Covers binary analysis, memory safety validation, cryptography implementation review, fuzzing, exploit development, and zero-day discovery for organizations requiring the highest assurance level.
Red Team Operation
Full adversarial simulation against your people, processes, and technology simultaneously. Active Directory and Kerberos attacks, cloud infrastructure exploitation, web application compromise, physical security challenges, and social engineering campaigns – measured against your detection and response capability.
Purple Team Exercise
Red and blue teams operate jointly. Attack techniques are executed in real time while detection engineers validate SIEM rules, EDR coverage, and response playbooks. Produces a MITRE ATT&CK technique coverage matrix with direct attack-versus-detection correlation for every tactic tested.
22+ Target Types Across Every Environment
Every assessment surface is covered by dedicated testing modules with purpose-built toolchains and vulnerability category mappings.
Web and API Applications
Full OWASP Top 10 coverage for web applications, REST APIs, GraphQL (introspection attacks, batching DoS, resolver injection), SOAP, and microservices. Includes all 23+ CWE categories: SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, SSRF, XXE, path traversal, insecure deserialization, BOLA/BFLA, and more.
Cloud Infrastructure
AWS, Azure, and GCP environments assessed for IAM misconfiguration, overprivileged roles, public storage bucket exposure, serverless function security, metadata service (IMDS) exploitation, Kubernetes RBAC escalation, container escape, and secrets extraction from cluster namespaces.
Active Directory and Identity
Kerberoasting, AS-REP roasting, NTLM relay, pass-the-hash, pass-the-ticket, Golden Ticket and Silver Ticket attacks, AD Certificate Services exploitation, LSASS and NTDS.dit credential dumping, BloodHound attack path analysis, and domain controller enumeration.
Mobile Applications
iOS and Android application assessments covering insecure data storage, improper authentication, broken cryptography, client-side injection, dynamic runtime analysis, binary protections, certificate pinning bypass, and backend API trust boundary testing.
AI and LLM Systems
Complete OWASP LLM Top 10:2025 coverage (LLM01 through LLM10): prompt injection, sensitive information disclosure, supply chain vulnerabilities, training data and model poisoning, improper output handling, excessive agency, system prompt leakage, vector and embedding weaknesses, misinformation generation, and unbounded consumption attacks.
Healthcare and Medical Devices
Clinical network zone segmentation validation, IoMT device discovery and vulnerability assessment, HL7 v2.x protocol security, FHIR R4 API testing, DICOM/PACS security testing, and PHI exposure detection – all production-safe and read-only. Compliance scored against HIPAA, ADHICS, NCA ECC, DHA NABIDH, Qatar NIA, and Saudi SHIE simultaneously.
Supply Chain and SBOM
Software Bill of Materials analysis across 10 dependency manifest formats (npm, PyPI, Maven, Go, Cargo, RubyGems, Composer, and more). CVE correlation via OSV.dev with CVSS and EPSS scoring, license risk classification, end-of-life package detection, and unpinned dependency identification.
Low-Code and No-Code Platforms
Dedicated assessment modules for Microsoft Power Platform, Mendix, OutSystems, Appian, Salesforce, and ServiceNow against the OWASP LCNC Top 10 – including multi-tenant isolation testing, shared connection abuse, and service account impersonation attacks.
Ransomware Resilience Simulation
Production-safe, isolated kill-chain simulations of LockBit 3.0, Conti, Maze, and BlackCat/ALPHV ransomware families. Tests detection coverage at every phase: initial access, privilege escalation, lateral movement, discovery, data exfiltration, and encryption – without touching production data.
A Nine-Phase Methodology. No Shortcuts.
Every engagement follows a deterministic workflow from authorization through verified remediation. Autonomous tooling handles orchestration – our analysts focus on context, interpretation, and what the tools miss.
-
Authorization and Scoping
Targets, boundaries, methodology, and approval tier confirmed. High-risk techniques require senior sign-off before execution begins.
-
Reconnaissance
Passive and active intelligence gathering: DNS enumeration, port scanning, service fingerprinting, SSL/TLS analysis, subdomain enumeration, and technology stack detection.
-
Attack Planning
Tool and technique selection based on discovered attack surface, MITRE ATT&CK coverage goals, team type, and methodology constraints. Plan documented before execution begins.
-
Execution
Attack modules run against confirmed targets. A MITRE ATT&CK concordance gate enforces minimum technique coverage – if not met, the plan adapts and retries rather than under-delivering.
-
Threat Intelligence Enrichment
Every finding automatically enriched via IP reputation, malware analysis, and CVE intelligence databases. Confidence scores updated with real-world threat context.
-
Analysis and Risk Aggregation
Individual findings correlated into attack chains. Historical finding embeddings from 17,000+ prior assessments queried semantically to surface similar past vulnerabilities and proven remediations.
-
Verification
False positives eliminated through retesting. Every finding receives a confidence score before inclusion in the report.
-
Reporting
Professional PDF report rendered with executive summary, per-finding technical detail, CVSS v4.0 scores, MITRE ATT&CK coverage matrix, compliance control mapping, and a prioritized remediation roadmap.
-
Remediation Tracking
Finding lifecycle tracked through open, in progress, pending approval, verified, and overdue states – with SLA enforcement per severity, owner assignment, and Jira integration for your existing workflow.
Engagement Deliverables
-
Executive SummaryBusiness-impact narrative + risk posture rating
-
Technical Findings ReportPhase-by-phase findings with full evidence captures
-
MITRE ATT&CK Coverage MapTechnique heatmap + detection gap analysis
-
Compliance ScorecardControl pass/fail across your chosen frameworks
-
Remediation RoadmapPrioritized fix list with effort and SLA per severity
-
Machine-Readable ExportsJSON, CSV, SARIF — ready for SIEM or SOAR import
The Platform Executes. Our Analysts Focus on What Machines Miss.
The engine selects tools from an 87-integration library, orchestrates them across a nine-phase workflow, enforces MITRE ATT&CK technique coverage at a dedicated concordance gate, and retries automatically when thresholds are not met — without waiting for human instruction at each step.
Dashed amber line: MITRE ATT&CK concordance gate — execution replans and retries if technique coverage targets are not met. Scroll to view on small screens.
Tool Selection is Automated
The platform evaluates the discovered attack surface, the active methodology, and the current phase to select and chain the right tools. Nmap findings feed into Nuclei. Service banners route to the appropriate exploitation module. No manual handoff between tools, no context lost between steps.
Coverage is Enforced, Not Estimated
A MITRE ATT&CK concordance gate validates technique coverage before the execution phase advances. If the threshold is not met, the engine replans and retries with different tooling. Engagements do not close with coverage gaps — the platform does not allow it.
Every Finding Matched Against History
At analysis time, each finding is matched against 17,000+ prior assessment results via semantic vector search. Similar past vulnerabilities surface the remediations that worked, the recurrence rate, and the compliance controls they mapped to in comparable environments.
One Finding. Every Auditor’s Checklist. Automatically.
Every finding is enriched in a single pipeline pass — CVSS v4.0, EPSS, CWE, MITRE ATT&CK, OWASP, and every applicable compliance control tagged before the report is generated. Select a category below to see exactly what gets attached.
Scoring & Risk
Quantitative Risk Metrics
Four numeric risk signals are calculated and attached to every finding automatically at pipeline exit — no analyst estimation, no manual lookup. The result is an objectively ranked finding list from day one.
- CVSS v4.0 Base score, temporal modifiers, and environmental context
- EPSS 30-day exploitation probability from FIRST’s prediction model
- CWE Root-cause weakness classification — used to group remediation patterns
- CISA KEV Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog membership check
SQL Injection — Unauthenticated
Scoring & Risk tags — highlighted
Attack Mapping
Adversary Technique Classification
Each finding is mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK technique it represents — tactic, technique ID, and sub-technique — enabling your blue team to validate detection coverage against what was actually tested, not a theoretical framework.
- MITRE ATT&CK v15 Tactic and technique ID with sub-technique where applicable
- Technique ID Direct link to the ATT&CK entry for the detection engineering team
- PTEs (Penetration Testing Execution Standard) Phase-level classification across Recon through Reporting
- NIST SP 800-115 Technical Guide to Information Security Testing classification
SQL Injection — Unauthenticated
Attack Mapping tags — highlighted
OWASP Standards
Application Security Classification
Findings are automatically categorized against the full OWASP portfolio in a single pass — web, API, LLM, mobile, and low-code surfaces are all covered without requiring a separate engagement per standard.
- OWASP Top 10:2021 Web application risk categories A01–A10
- API Top 10:2023 API-specific risks — broken object-level auth, mass assignment, and more
- LLM Top 10:2025 AI and large language model security risks
- Mobile Top 10:2024 & LCNC Top 10 Mobile application and low-code/no-code platform risks
SQL Injection — Unauthenticated
OWASP tags — highlighted
Compliance
Regulatory Control Mapping
Every finding links to the specific control section it violates across all your active compliance frameworks simultaneously — not just the regulation name, but the exact requirement reference an auditor will cite.
- PCI DSS v4.0.1 Requirement-level mapping for cardholder data environment scope
- ISO 27001:2022 & NIST CSF 2.0 Annex A control and CSF function/category mapping
- SOC 2 Type II Trust Service Criteria mapped at the criteria level
- FedRAMP, HIPAA, HITRUST CSF Additional frameworks available by engagement scope
SQL Injection — Unauthenticated
Compliance tags — highlighted
Regional & Sector
Jurisdiction & Industry Regulations
Findings are tagged against the specific regulatory instruments for your region and industry — mapped at the article or section level, not just the regulation name. Particularly relevant for clients in the GCC, EU, and regulated sectors such as healthcare and finance.
- NIS2 Directive & GDPR EU article-level mapping — Art. 21 security measures and Art. 32 technical controls
- NCA ECC (Saudi Arabia) Essential Cybersecurity Controls for Saudi-regulated entities
- Jordan PDPL & Qatar NIA v3 Data protection and national information assurance for MENA jurisdictions
- ADHICS v2.0 (Abu Dhabi) Abu Dhabi Healthcare Information and Cyber Security standard
SQL Injection — Unauthenticated
Regional & Sector tags — highlighted
Twelve Lenses. One Engagement Decision.
Select the knowledge level that fits your threat scenario and the collaboration model that fits your team. Every combination runs on the same nine-phase workflow with full toolchain support.
Knowledge Level — How much information do we start with?
Zero prior knowledge. Simulates an unauthenticated external attacker with no documentation, credentials, or network topology.
Limited credentials or segment access provided. Simulates a compromised partner account or lateral movement from an existing foothold.
Full technical disclosure: source code, architecture diagrams, credentials, and network topology. Exposes logic flaws invisible to external testing.
Runtime depth on top of whitebox access. Debug hooks, memory inspection, process instrumentation — applied to highest-criticality systems.
Collaboration Model — Who runs the engagement and what is the objective?
Full adversary simulation. APT threat actor profiles, MITRE ATT&CK-aligned kill chains, 490+ pre-built scenarios, and detection evasion tracking.
Defensive control validation. Runs attack scenarios while your blue team observes — measures detection latency, alert coverage, and response quality.
Readiness assessment. Evaluates detection engineering, SOC triage effectiveness, incident response playbook coverage, and EDR rule quality.
Architecture and design review. Validates STRIDE threat model coverage, security control placement, and design-level gaps before deployment.
Developer security uplift. Demonstrates attack paths directly to engineering teams so vulnerabilities are understood at the code level.
DevSecOps integration. Validates that controls are instrumented correctly in CI/CD pipelines and that detection rules fire as designed.
Neutral governance layer. Manages rules of engagement, operates the kill switch protocol, and maintains full audit accountability.
Business context-driven. Testing sequence follows asset criticality and your threat model — critical assets receive Tier 1 scrutiny first.
Nine Attack Surfaces. Zero Left Untested.
Each engagement draws from a purpose-built capability set matched to your environment. Below is what the testing actually covers — not a tool inventory.
Reconnaissance & Asset Discovery
Full port enumeration across all 65,535 TCP/UDP ports, passive and active subdomain discovery, certificate transparency mining, WAF and CDN fingerprinting, and technology stack identification. Output is a ranked target inventory scored by external exposure before any active testing begins.
Web Application & API Testing
Full OWASP Top 10 and API Top 10 coverage across authenticated and unauthenticated flows. Injection, broken authentication, SSRF, IDOR, mass assignment, and business logic flaws are tested through both automated scanning and targeted manual exploitation. Every flagged finding is verified before it enters the report.
Vulnerability Assessment
Static source analysis, secret scanning across commit history and runtime configuration, infrastructure-as-code misconfiguration detection, and dynamic network scanning — all in a single pipeline pass. Every finding is scored with CVSS v4.0 and EPSS before the phase closes.
Exploitation & Post-Exploitation
Controlled, scope-limited exploitation to confirm actual impact — not theoretical severity. Credential attacks, privilege escalation chains, and lateral movement paths are traced end-to-end and documented with full timestamped evidence captures.
Active Directory & Identity
Depth not found elsewhereComplete AD attack chain simulation from initial foothold to Domain Admin: AS-REP roasting, Kerberoasting, NTLM relay, ACL abuse, and all eight ADCS certificate misconfiguration classes (ESC1–ESC8). BloodHound graph analysis maps every privilege escalation path so remediation targets root causes, not symptoms.
Mobile Security
iOS & Android — MASVS L1/L2Static binary analysis, runtime instrumentation, SSL pinning bypass, and API traffic interception on live device or emulator. Testing covers data storage, cryptography implementation, authentication flows, and backend API trust boundaries — mapped to MASVS Level 1 and Level 2 with evidence from each control.
Container & Kubernetes
Runtime + control-planeContainer escape attempts against running workloads, RBAC privilege escalation path analysis, secrets extraction from etcd and environment variables, and network policy bypass validation. Every cluster privilege path to cluster-admin is mapped and documented before the engagement closes.
Cloud Security
Configuration audit across AWS, Azure, and GCP: IAM over-privilege, public storage exposure, serverless function injection, IMDS abuse, and metadata endpoint exposure. Results are mapped to cloud-native security benchmarks and tied to the specific misconfigurations that enable privilege escalation or data exfiltration.
Healthcare Protocol Testing
HL7 · FHIR · DICOMPurpose-built protocol testers for HL7 v2.x message injection, FHIR R4 resource access control, DICOM storage and retrieval security, and SMART-on-FHIR OAuth flow validation — not generic fuzzing applied to healthcare endpoints. Findings are mapped to HIPAA technical safeguard requirements by default.
▲ Blue border — capabilities not available on standard penetration testing platforms.
Eight Reports. Every Stakeholder Covered.
Every engagement closes with a complete evidence package generated automatically at the end of Phase 9. Select the formats your team needs — all are produced from the same underlying finding data.
C-Suite
Executive Summary
Business impact narrative, risk posture rating, and investment priorities — no technical jargon.
Security Team
Technical Report
Phase-by-phase findings, tool output, request/response evidence, and remediation guidance.
Auditors
Compliance Scorecard
Control pass/fail/partial status across all applicable frameworks with compliance percentage.
SOC & Detection
MITRE ATT&CK Map
Technique coverage heatmap, detection gap analysis, and which controls fired vs. were evaded.
Red Team & CISO
Attack Narrative
Complete kill chain documentation from initial access through impact — with timestamps and evidence.
Blue Team
Detection Engineering
SIGMA rule recommendations, EDR tuning guidance, and detection coverage gap analysis.
Engineering & Architects
Architecture Review
Threat model findings, STRIDE coverage gaps, and control design recommendations.
Project Management
Remediation Roadmap
Prioritized fix list with severity, effort estimate, and framework control alignment per item.